Sobre os transcendentais

“Though he doesn’t put it this way, what Polanyi is pointing out here is that modern scientists are implicitly committed to the reality of truth as truth is understood within the doctrine of the transcendentals – that is to say, to truth conceived of as being or reality in its relation to an intellect. The reason they prefer terms like “simplicity” and “economy” is that they tend also to be committed to the assumption that intellect is a highly derivative phenomenon – a mere byproduct of evolutionary history that appears very late in the game as it were – and thus ought not to enter into our characterization of reality at the most fundamental level. And the trouble is that when this reference to the intellect is deleted, it is no longer clear why simplicity and the like ought to be criteria of theory choice.
Keats was right to say that “beauty is truth, truth beauty,” but wrong to follow up this claim with the further assertion that “that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” For we do need to know something else – namely the traditional, Scholastic metaphysics that makes the first claim intelligible.”
Edward Feser (texto completo)

Da sabedoria ordinária

“Não há força maior que encontrar nos pontos mais essenciais, em toda a sua luz, as afirmações mais comuns da humanidade. Elas permanecem como fórmulas vãs e banais se não saem do fundo de nós mesmos como se fôssemos nós mesmos quem as tivesse inventado. Deve parecer-nos, ao mesmo tempo, que nós sempre as soubemos e que as encontramos pela primeira vez. Mas é estéril começar por tomá-las de fora acreditando que é possível em seguida reavivá-las dando-lhes uma espécie de calor emprestado.”
Louis Lavelle,  Regras para a vida cotidiana